Personal Closeness and Perceived Torture Efficacy: If Torture Will Save Someone I’m Close To, Then it Must Work
نویسندگان
چکیده
Psychological research on the efficacy of torture frequently excludes an important question: What causes people to believe that torture is effective? We investigated whether a factor increasing persons’ desire for torture to be effective might lead them to perceive that it was more effective. Across 2 studies, participants evaluated hypothetical crisis scenarios that varied in the degree of personal closeness to the potential victim of the perpetrator in the crisis. They then indicated the degree to which they believed that torture would be effective in the scenario. Findings revealed that personal closeness to the victim led to the belief that using torture would be more effective. Results further suggested that perceived efficacy in part accounted for the effect of personal closeness on torture support in the scenario. These studies help inform our understanding of the psychology of people’s perceptions about torture in applied circumstances.
منابع مشابه
Torture Warrants, Necessity, and Self-Defense
This article explores a debate over the legal mechanisms by which interrogational torture could be sanctioned. Four separate proposals are considered, including: civil disobedience; torture warrants; self-defense; and necessity. Civil disobedience does not allow for legalized torture, but may allow for reduced punishments. Torture warrants contrast with self-defense and necessity in terms of of...
متن کاملTortured beliefs: How and when prior support for torture skews the perceived value of coerced information
• US adult judgments of terrorism scenarios were skewed by prior support for torture. • Those previously supporting torture saw coerced information as more valuable. • Torture opposers did not show a bias for or against coerced information. • Results also revealed a “selective efficacy” boundary concerning informant identity. • Supporters privileged coerced information from outgroup but not ing...
متن کاملThe medical aspects of the UN Convention against Torture.
Introduction The Committee against Torture (CAT), is one of seven treaty bodies in the UN system. Table 1 gives an overview of the treaty bodies: when they entered into force, the number of experts and the number of State Parties to the Convention. A treaty body is “a committee of independent experts appointed to monitor the implementation by States Parties of the core international human right...
متن کاملP165: A Pre-Review: The Psychodynamics of Torture under the Totalitarian Control
Torture is aimed to create a living dead. Pressing systematic control on individuals who are in opposition to the ruling authorities, persons’ sense of self would be damaged. Such an aversive situation is caused by intentional human action rather than natural causes. Torture occurs in more than 90 countries (Abu Ghraib prison is a prominent example) however, epidemiologic data are limited. The ...
متن کاملA Defense of Torture: Separation of Cases, Ticking Time-bombs, and Moral Justification
In this paper, I argue for the permissibility of torture in idealized cases by application of separation of cases: if torture is permissible given any of the dominant moral theories (and if one of those is correct), then torture is permissible simpliciter and I can discharge the tricky business of trying to adjudicate among conflicting moral views. To be sure, torture is not permissible on all ...
متن کامل